Some songs were quite interesting. My friends were not impressed.
One friend said, "Fishbone meets Grateful Dead."
Another said, "a new and improved punkier version of Hootie and the Blowfish.
A third good friend said, "Gimmick. All gimmick."
The gimmick comment stuck.
What distinguishes a gimmick? Innovation as gimmick versus innovation as honest?
1. a piece of trickery or manipulation intended to achieve a result dishonestly
2. a piece of concealed information that, if known, would make an offer or opportunity less attractive
3. something such as a new technique or device that attracts attention or publicity
4. an ingenious device, mechanism, or ploy, especially one that works in a concealed way
My students would say if it's deep, it's not a gimmick.
A gimmick is all surface? Surface of "smart" with nothing underneath?
The period style is not a gimmick. Repeat, the period style is not a gimmick.
Everytime I think I am moving ahead of the curve I realize I'm two years behind. Or the curve is two years behind and the great ones have caught up to the present age.
I love Chicago Review. Just ordered a subscription. A great review of Randolph Healy's work. Nothing like Heaney. A great essay by Michael Palmer on poetry and contingency. Now there's two great poets. Healy and Palmer makes me feel and think all at the same time.
My head comes right off.
I am tired of smart for smart's sake.
How about some emotional and intellectual honesty.